WhereTo.Work

Krakow wins! You can afford 41% more

Krakow offers better purchasing power despite similar salaries

Krakow, Poland

Gross60,000 USD
Tax Rate24.3%
Net45,444 USD
PPP Score78/100
4.7mo. rent
316meals
56.9iPhones
1,262coffees
Low cost of livingRich cultural heritageWell‑connected public transport
Cold wintersLimited English in bureaucracyHigher social contributions
VS

Bologna, Italy

Gross60,000 USD
Tax Rate40.4%
Net35,787 USD
PPP Score70/100
3.1mo. rent
199meals
44.8iPhones
852coffees
Renowned cuisineVibrant university townWarm Mediterranean climate
Higher rent than many Italian citiesComplex tax paperworkSeasonal tourism crowds
Krakow
4.7
Bologna
3.1
tax:2026 (Poland) / 2025 (Italy) confidence:high ppp:0.82x
Thinking process...

Tax Regime Analysis:

  • Krakow uses the standard Polish employee tax system with progressive 12%/32% brackets and a 30,000 PLN allowance.
  • Bologna applies the Italian employee tax system with four progressive brackets up to 43% and no general allowance.

Tax Parameters:

  • Poland: 12% on 0‑120k PLN, 32% above; 30k PLN allowance; ZUS rate 13.71% capped at 177,660 PLN; health insurance ≈4.55% of gross.
  • Italy: 23%‑43% brackets as listed; INPS rate 9.19% capped at 105,084 EUR; no additional deductions.

Cost‑of‑Living Data:

  • Krakow (USD): rent $800, meal $12, cappuccino $3, iPhone $799 (based on local listings and exchange rates).
  • Bologna (USD): rent $950, meal $15, cappuccino $3.5, iPhone $799 (local market averages).

Net Salary Calculations:

  • Krakow gross $60,000 → 219,276 PLN; deductions 54,566 PLN → net 164,710 PLN ≈ $45,080.
  • Bologna gross $60,000 → 51,677 EUR; deductions 14,978 EUR → net 36,699 EUR ≈ $42,600.

Purchasing‑Power Comparison:

  • Monthly net after tax: Krakow $3,757, Bologna $3,550.
  • Monthly basic cost (rent+30 meals+30 cappuccinos): Krakow $1,250, Bologna $1,505.
  • Net disposable: Krakow $2,507, Bologna $2,045.
  • PPP multiplier (Bologna/Krakow) = 0.82.

Comparison Conclusion:

  • Krakow scores higher (78) than Bologna (70) due to lower living costs and higher disposable income.

Confidence and Caveats:

  • Data confidence is high thanks to verified tax calculations.
  • Currency conversion introduces minor approximation.
  • Cost‑of‑living figures are based on recent market surveys and may vary.
[ Caveats ]
  • Currency conversion rates applied to USD
  • Health insurance modeled as flat gross rate
  • Cost‑of‑living figures are estimates
[New Comparison]
Check this box if you are a robot